Alaska Section, American Water Resources Association
Michael R. Lilly, Alaska Section AWRA Northern-Region Director
I would like to invite you to the December Brown-Bag presentation by Bob Burrows. Bob's talk should be of interest
to hydrologists and engineers working in Arctic and sub-Arctic surface-water erosional projects. The deteriation of the
nations bridges is a major concern both in Alaska and the lower "48".
December 1996 Alaska Section AWRA Norther Region Brown Bag Lunch Meeting Presentation
Robert L. Burrows, U.S. Geological Survey.
"Estimating Scour at Bridges with Historical Data"
Failures of bridges over water are caused primarily by scour and channel instability. Over the past several
years the Federal Highway Administration has mandated that all
states evaluate bridges over water for potential failure. These
evaluations have ranged from subjective risk rankings based on
site visits to computer modeling using field-surveyed input data.
In Alaska, the U. S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, has
been conducting evaluations of channel stability and scour at bridges
in cooperation with the Alaska Department of Transportation and
Public Facilities. Initial analyses were done by utilizing the
water surface profile model, WSPRO to model the hydraulics at
the bridge in order to calculate potential scour. Instead of visiting
each site and surveying the channel geometry and streambed slope
to provide the input for WSPRO, all input data were taken from
the as-built plans, bridge inspection notes, maps, photographs,
and USGS streamflow data where available. In some instances it
was necessary to make estimates of some input data. Generally
only one cross-section was available, and other sections needed
in WSPRO were replicated up and downstream by the model. Once
a successful, and apparently hydraulically sound model run was
made, the 100 year and 500 year flood flows were run by the model
and the results used to compute contraction scour and pier scour
at each bridge site.
A selected number of bridges that appeared to be scour critical were field surveyed. The new data were then
used to make a new WSPRO model run and scour calculations were
redone. The results of the updated calculations were compared
with the original as well as the actual measured scour depths
apparent on site. This methodology provides a means of estimating
potential scour without costly field surveys and provides an objective
method for screening bridge sites for scour susceptibility.
|